USA (Washington Insider Magazine)— Defense Minister Yoav Gallant has publicly criticized Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich for delaying permission two squadrons of fighter jets purchased for the Israeli Air Force due to persistent security concerns.
Reasons for Delay
According to reports from Ynet in April, Smotrich vetoed the acquisition of new F-15 and F-35 aircraft until a Knesset committee, responsible for examining the defense budget, was convened. Smotrich emphasized the need to learn from past mistakes before proceeding with strategic and long-term military acquisitions.
Financing and Security Concerns
According to Enlacejudio, The two fighter jet squadrons are to be financed with US military aid to Israel rather than state funds. Gallant highlighted the urgency of enhancing Israel’s defense capabilities in the face of escalating threats, citing recent Iranian missile and drone attacks.
Consequences of Delay
Gallant warned that any delay in finalizing the purchase from the United States could result in a three-year setback and an additional billion-shekel cost to Israel. He stressed that failing to secure the deal promptly could allow another client to take Israel’s place.
Security Implications
The defense minister underscored that the delay in procurement poses a significant security risk for Israel, especially amid ongoing conflicts on multiple fronts. Gallant emphasized the critical importance of strengthening Israel’s defense capabilities without delay.
Response from Smotrich’s Office
In reaction to the criticism, Smotrich’s office issued a statement saying that the finance minister had sought the formation of a committee to investigate Israel’s defense budget at the next cabinet meeting. However, the delay in convening this committee was criticized for hindering critical acquisitions required to strengthen IDF units and the overall military system.
As tensions persist and security threats evolve, the debate over the timing and process of military acquisitions reflects the broader challenge of balancing national security priorities with fiscal responsibility.
